;; The first three lines of this file were inserted by DrRacket. They record metadata ;; about the language level of this file in a form that our tools can easily process. #reader(lib "htdp-advanced-reader.ss" "lang")((modname X0-tests) (read-case-sensitive #t) (teachpacks ()) (htdp-settings #(#t constructor repeating-decimal #t #t none #f () #f))) ; Note: this file is written in *advanced*-student ; (because the test-functions do sequences of I/O, rather than return values). ; Your program should be written in "intermediate student with lambda". (require "X0.rkt") (require "scanner.rkt") (require rackunit) (require "student-extras.rkt") ; solely for `for-each` ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; TEST CASES: X0 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Some expressions to test in a non-automated way: (check-equal? (parse! (create-scanner "34")) 34) (check-equal? (parse! (create-scanner "-34")) -34) (check-equal? (string->expr "34") 34) (check-equal? (string->expr "[34]") (make-paren 34)) (check-equal? (string->expr "~3 add 4!") (make-binop 3 "add" 4)) (check-equal? (string->expr "~[34] add ~3 mlt 4!!") (make-binop (make-paren 34) "add" (make-binop 3 "mlt" 4))) (check-equal? (string->expr "if0 3 thn 7 els 9;") (make-if0 3 7 9)) (check-equal? (string->expr "if0 [34] thn ~3 mlt 4! els 7 ;") (make-if0 (make-paren 34) (make-binop 3 "mlt" 4) 7)) (check-equal? (string->expr "if0 [34] thn ~[34] add ~3 mlt 4!! els if0 3 thn 7 els 9;;") (make-if0 (make-paren 34) (make-binop (make-paren 34) "add" (make-binop 3 "mlt" 4)) (make-if0 3 7 9))) (check-equal? (eval 34) 34) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "[34]")) 34) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "~3 add 4!")) 7) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "~ 3 sub 4 !")) -1) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "~3 mlt 4!")) 12) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "if0 3 thn 4 els 5;")) 5) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "if0 0 thn 4 els 5;")) 4) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "if0 ~4 sub 2! thn ~1 add 2! els ~3 add 4! ;")) 7) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "if0 7 thn ~3 add 4! els 5 ;")) 5) (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "34")) "34") (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "[34]")) "[34]") (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "~3 add 4!")) "~3 add 4!") (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "~3 sub 4!")) "~3 sub 4!") (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr " ~ 3 mlt 4 ! ")) "~3 mlt 4!") (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "if0 3 thn 4 els 5 ;")) "if0 3 thn 4 els 5;") (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "if0 0 thn ~3 add 4! els 5 ;")) "if0 0 thn ~3 add 4! els 5;") ;; Add more specific tests here, ;; if you want things more specific that provided via adding to `all-tests` below. (define e0 "43") (define e1 "[43]") (define e2 "~4 add 3!") (define e3 "[[~4 add [3]!]]") (define e4 "~[43] add ~42 mlt 3!!") ;;; we can automate checking that string->expr is the (right)inverses of expr->string: (for-each (λ(e) (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr e)) e)) (list e0 e1 e2 e3 e4)) ; `for-each` is like map except that it discards the result from each function-call; ; it is suitable for functions which are called solely for a side-effect. ; (`test-all` is such a function.) ;;; Though we also want to check that e0..e4 eval to 43,43,7,7,169 respectively. (for-each (λ(e v) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr e)) v)) ; is the source-Expression; v for Value (list e0 e1 e2 e3 e4) (list 43 43 7 7 169)) ;;; The above is a promising start, to automating tests. ;;; Okay, we'll generalize the above to a more complete test-harness. ;;; One thing, is that we don't want to have two parallel-lists; ;;; instead keep a list of pairs. ;;; Three sorts of tests we want to make, for many different exprs: (check-equal? (string->expr "~4 add 3!") (make-binop 4 "add" 3)) (check-equal? (eval (string->expr "~4 add 3!")) 7) (check-equal? (expr->string (string->expr "~4 add 3!")) "~4 add 3!") ; Data Def'n: a `S-example` is a list of length two or length three: ; '[str val] (where val is the expected result `(eval (string->expr str))`, or ; '[str val expr] (as above, but `expr` is the internal (struct) representation of `(string->expr str)`). ; A list of S-examples; ; The last line of this file runs two-to-three tests on each S-example. ; ; BE AWARE of the comma preceding the constructors; it's necessary to actually call it. ; See explanation at http://www.radford.edu/~itec380/2020fall-ibarland/Lectures/backquote.html ; (define all-tests `{("7" 7 7) ("[3]" 3 ,(make-paren 3)) ("~3 add 4!" 7 ,(make-binop 3 "add" 4)) ("~3 mlt 4!" 12 ,(make-binop 3 "mlt" 4 )) ("~~3 add 4! add ~3 mlt 4!!" 19) ("~[3] mlt [~2 add 3!]!" 15) ("if0 0 thn 1 els 2;" 1 ,(make-if0 0 1 2)) ("if0 1 thn 1 els 2 ;" 2 ,(make-if0 1 1 2)) ("if0 ~3 add -3! thn 1 els 2 ;" 1 ,(make-if0 (make-binop 3 "add" -3) 1 2)) ("if0 ~if0 if0 0 thn 1 els 2 ; thn 3 els 4 ; add -3! thn 1 els 2 ;" 2 ,(make-if0 (make-binop (make-if0 (make-if0 0 1 2) 3 4) "add" -3) 1 2)) #| ;>>>X1 tests ; Uncomment these tests, once `mod` is implemented: ("~3 mod 4!" 3) ("~~5 add 6! mod 3!" 2) ("~8.1 mod 3!" 2.1) ("~8 mod 3.1!" 1.8) ("~-8.1 mod 3!" 0.9) ("~-8 mod 3.1!" 1.3) ("~8.1 mod -3!" -0.9) ("~8 mod -3.1!" -1.3) ("~-8.1 mod -3!" -2.1) ("~-8 mod -3.1!" -1.8) ("~8 mod 2!" 0) ("~-8 mod 2!" 0) ("~8 mod -2!" 0) ("~-8 mod -2!" 0) ("~8 mod 3!" 2) ("~-8 mod 3!" 1) ("~8 mod -3!" -1) ("~-8 mod -3!" -2) YOU-MUST-CREATE-SOME-TESTS-FOR-IfPos |# }) ; ; For info on backquote, see documentation and/or: ; http://www.radford.edu/itec380/2020fall-ibarland/Lectures/backquote.html ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; helper functions ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;; The following functions should really be in a separate file, and exported from there. ;; However, putting this in to a file 'Xi-test-harness.rkt' would become mildly problematic: ;; since it calls 'eval', 'string->expr' as provided in X0, it needs to require X0.rkt. ;; As we update our implementation X0.rkt to X2.rkt,X4.rkt etc, ;; we'd then need to update *this* file each time, changing *nothing* but the 'require'. Yuck. ;; An actual solution would be using "units", where when we call `require` we "pass in" the dependencies: ;; http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/creatingunits.html?q=unit#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Funit..rkt%29._unit%29%29 ;; ;; But rather than add that level of indirection for a student-assignment, we'll just repeat ;; this code inside each Xi-test.rkt. ; my-check-equal? : any, any, string -> boolean ; If the two values aren't equal, print an error message. ; (Nothing prints on success; that is better done at a higher level, in `test-all`.) ; >>>Uses the global-variable `prog#`. ; (define (my-check-equal? actual expected err-msg) (let {[result (equal? actual expected)]} (begin (when (not result) (printf "~ntest-program #~a failed:\n~a\n" prog# err-msg)) result))) ; test-internal-representation : Xi-example -> boolean ; Test that t parses to the correct internal tree-representation (if provided) ; (define (test-internal-representation t) (or (< (length t) 3) ; don't call it failure, if no internal-rep provided to test against. (with-handlers {[exn:fail? (print-exception-and t 'parse)]} (my-check-equal? (string->expr (first t)) (third t) (format "Parsing ~v\nresulted in ~v\ninstead of ~v\nas expected." (first t) (string->expr (first t)) (third t)))))) ; test-eval : Xi-example -> boolean ; Test that the Xi-example `eval`s to what it should. ; (define (test-eval t) (with-handlers {[exn:fail? (print-exception-and t 'eval)]} (my-check-equal? (eval (string->expr (first t))) (second t) (format "Program ~v\neval'd to ~v\ninstead of ~v\nas expected." (first t) (eval (string->expr (first t))) (second t))))) ; test-parse-inverse-of-to-string : Xi-example -> void? ; Test that `parse` and `expr->string` are inverses of each other: ; `parse` is a right-inverse: for a string `s`, (expr->string (parse s)) = s, and ; `parse` is a left- inverse: for a tree `expr`, (parse (expr->string expr)) = expr. ; Note that spaces between tokens in a string is ignored, so they're not *quite* exact inverses. ; ; Also, other tests are redundant with checking the left-inverse, ; but we still check it to be independent of other code. ; (define (test-parse-inverse-of-to-string t) (and (with-handlers {[exn:fail? (print-exception-and t 'parse-then-tostring)]} (my-check-equal? (string->tokens (expr->string (string->expr (first t)))) (string->tokens (first t)) (format "Parsing ~v then converting back to string gave ~v." (first t) (expr->string (string->expr (first t)))))) (or (< (length t) 3) ; don't call it failure, if we don't have info to do further test! (with-handlers {[exn:fail? (print-exception-and t 'tostring-then-parse)]} (my-check-equal? (string->expr (expr->string (third t))) (third t) (format "Converting ~v to string and re-parsing it gave ~v." (third t) (expr->string (third t)))))))) ; test-one-prog-2-4-ways : Xi-example -> void? ; Make sure that t meets the following properties: ; i. Parsing the string results in the expected internal representation (*) ; ii. Check that parsing the string and then to-string'ing the result ; gives back the initial string ; iii. Check that to-string'ing the internal representation and then parsing ; that resulting string gives back the initial internal representation (*) ; iv. check that eval'ing the (parsed) string gives the expected value. ; ; (*) steps i,iii can only be performed if the Xi-example contained all three values. ; If it only contained a string and a value, then only *two* tests get performed. ; This affects the test-number reported, should a later test fail. ; (define prog# 0) (define (test-one-prog-2-4-ways t) (begin (set! prog# (add1 prog#)) (printf ".") (begin0 (and (test-internal-representation t) (test-parse-inverse-of-to-string t) ; N.B. counts as two tests (test-eval t)) (when (zero? (remainder prog# 5)) (printf " "))))) (define exceptions-seen 0) (define (print-exception-and t where) (λ(exn) (begin (set! exceptions-seen (add1 exceptions-seen)) (printf "~nEXCEPTION: ~a~nOccurred while trying to ~a test-program #~a: ~v~n" (exn-message exn) where prog# (first t)) #f))) ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; run the tests ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; (printf "Running X-text-harness~n") (define test-results (map test-one-prog-2-4-ways all-tests)) ; This line actually invokes the checker (define n (length test-results)) (define fails (length (filter false? test-results))) (define passes (length (filter (λ(x) (equal? x #true)) test-results))) (if (zero? n) (printf "Please add X0 test-cases to `all-tests`.") (printf "~nX-text-harness done: ~v/~v (~v%) X0 programs passed 2-to-4 checks each; ~a.~n" passes n (floor (* 100 (/ passes n))) (if (zero? fails) "nice" (format "~v X0 programs failed" fails)))) ;; a line which just "re"prints out the tests, ;; except with the *actual* (not expected) results of eval, string->expr. ;; #;(pretty-print (map (λ(tst) (let* {[prog (string->expr (first tst))]} (list (expr->string prog) (eval prog)))) all-tests)) #| @author ibarland@radford.edu @version 2020-Oct-25 @original-at http://www.radford.edu/itec380/2020fall-ibarland/Homeworks/Project/X0-tests.rkt @license CC-BY -- share/adapt this file freely, but include attribution, thx. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Including a link to the *original* file satisifies "appropriate attribution". |#